0 users browsing Discussion. | 1 guest | 45 bots  
    Main » Discussion » Terminal colour schemes
    Pages: 1
    Posted on 18-12-12, 08:58
    Full mod

    Post: #61 of 443
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 1101 days
    Last view: 172 days
    Apparently Microsoft has finally changed the Windows 10 terminal colours from the traditional Windows 3.1 16 color palette to something a bit more readable.

    Unfortunately, GNOME Terminal doesn't exactly make it easy to set a custom palette. There's a lot of cool colour schemes in the world, but while every terminal has the same basic colour settings, there's a bunch of weird colour-scheme formats; it seems like there's a great opportunity for somebody to write a tool to convert between them.

    Preferably one that doesn't involve downloading shell-scripts from the internet and automatically running them.

    The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
    Posted on 18-12-12, 10:34
    Custom title here

    Post: #121 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 14 hours
    I like that Microsoft says it is because of modern high-contrast LCDs, when the colors are only a problem because LCDs are lower-contrast than CRTs were.
    SAVE US, SED! I MEAN PLASMA! I MEAN DLP! I MEAN OLED!

    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 18-12-12, 12:08

    Post: #46 of 210
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 1876 days
    Last view: 1848 days
    Pffft terminals in windows...
    Posted on 18-12-12, 12:08
    Affected by a raging stiffie

    Post: #104 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 196 days
    Last view: 9 hours
    Why not have terminals in Windows?
    Posted on 18-12-12, 12:32

    Post: #47 of 210
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 1876 days
    Last view: 1848 days
    ISWYDT
    Posted on 18-12-13, 17:09
    Banned
    Post: #15 of 28
    Since: 12-10-18

    Last post: 1409 days
    Last view: 1409 days
    I tend to use bright schemes wherever I go so my terminal is usually pure black on white, cannot stand it when non block solid colours are used on a terminal screen, it just isnt right to me :P
    Posted on 18-12-13, 18:24
    None of this makes any sense.

    Post: #107 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 196 days
    Last view: 9 hours
    Oof, my eyes burn at the thought.
    Posted on 18-12-14, 06:21
    Custom title here

    Post: #125 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 14 hours
    Posted by jjndig
    I tend to use bright schemes wherever I go so my terminal is usually pure black on white, cannot stand it when non block solid colours are used on a terminal screen, it just isnt right to me :P
    Green text on black background, one true way.
    ...
    I GUESS you can use amber too.

    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 18-12-15, 16:57
    Banned
    Post: #16 of 28
    Since: 12-10-18

    Last post: 1409 days
    Last view: 1409 days
    yea that's good too :)
    Posted on 18-12-18, 15:49
    Dinosaur

    Post: #85 of 1316
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 2 hours
    Last view: 2 hours
    All I want is a native xterm port for Windows, preferably as a cmd.exe (or whatever MS uses nowadays to render console apps) replacement.

    Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™
    Posted on 18-12-18, 16:55
    Natural Selection's gift to womankind

    Post: #110 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 196 days
    Last view: 9 hours
    cmd.exe uses the Console subsystem so the closest to "whatever MS uses nowadays to render console apps" would be... it was conhost.exe in Win7, at least.
    Posted on 18-12-19, 04:49
    Custom title here

    Post: #137 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 14 hours
    Also, MS is trying to retire cmd in favor of powershell.
    Alsoalso, Linux Subsystem for Windows will get you your lunixy bash interface.

    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 18-12-19, 09:03 (revision 9)
    Post: #55 of 426
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 499 days
    Last view: 14 days
    Powershell is annoying, it needs some commands to be prefixed with .\ and you also need to run some specific command before you can execute a PowerShell script with the necessary privileges (can't just run Powershell as an Administrator).


    Install-Module -Name SpeculationControl -RequiredVersion 1.0.11
    this string will just display an Open With dialog box for a blank (no name) file. Does anybody know how to get that command to actually work? It's taken from https://www.powershellgallery.com/packages/SpeculationControl/1.0.11

    https://imgur.com/a/z560BvO

    AMD Ryzen 3700X | MSI Gamer Geforce 1070Ti 8GB | 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 RAM | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | Windows 10 x64
    Posted on 18-12-19, 10:33
    Custom title here

    Post: #139 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 14 hours
    Posted by Nicholas Steel
    Powershell is annoying

    No lie.

    it needs some commands to be prefixed with .\

    That is for running an executable, as opposed to an internal command.
    IF you're in, say C:\MAME, you'd have to type .\mame64 to run the emulator, because it enforces a distinction between commands and files.

    . is just the current directory, so it is the same as typing c:\mame\mame64.exe

    and you also need to run some specific command before you can execute a PowerShell script with the necessary privileges (can't just run Powershell as an Administrator).

    Welcome to everyone blaming Microsoft for user error, part seventy-four.


    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 19-02-22, 16:56
    Stirrer of Shit
    Post: #22 of 717
    Since: 01-26-19

    Last post: 1763 days
    Last view: 1761 days
    Posted by Screwtape
    there's a great opportunity for somebody to write a tool to convert between them.

    base16 sounds like what you want. It supports Gnome Terminal.
    Posted by tomman
    All I want is a native xterm port for Windows, preferably as a cmd.exe (or whatever MS uses nowadays to render console apps) replacement.

    Cygwin had (has? haven't used it in years) a terminal that could run cmd.exe and other such programs. Don't remember the name but it looked good.



    There was a certain photograph about which you had a hallucination. You believed that you had actually held it in your hands. It was a photograph something like this.
    Posted on 19-02-23, 10:38 (revision 1)
    Post: #20 of 77
    Since: 10-31-18

    Last post: 1190 days
    Last view: 1116 days
    Posted by sureanem
    Posted by tomman
    All I want is a native xterm port for Windows, preferably as a cmd.exe (or whatever MS uses nowadays to render console apps) replacement.
    Cygwin had (has? haven't used it in years) a terminal that could run cmd.exe and other such programs. Don't remember the name but it looked good.
    mintty?
    Posted on 19-02-23, 23:41
    Stirrer of Shit
    Post: #27 of 717
    Since: 01-26-19

    Last post: 1763 days
    Last view: 1761 days
    Posted by jimbo1qaz
    Posted by sureanem

    Posted by tomman
    All I want is a native xterm port for Windows, preferably as a cmd.exe (or whatever MS uses nowadays to render console apps) replacement.

    Cygwin had (has? haven't used it in years) a terminal that could run cmd.exe and other such programs. Don't remember the name but it looked good.

    mintty?

    Yup, that's it. Although it seems to have some issues:
    Posted by https://mintty.github.io/

    Mintty works on all Windows versions from Windows XP onwards. Similarly to other Cygwin/MSYS terminals based on pseudo terminal ("pty") devices, however, mintty is not a full replacement for the Windows Console window (by default running the Windows Command Processor / command prompt / cmd.exe). While native console programs with simple text output usually work fine, interactive programs often have problems, although sometimes there are workarounds. See the Wiki section about Input/Output interaction for hints, especially on the winpty wrapper.

    (my emphasis)

    There was a certain photograph about which you had a hallucination. You believed that you had actually held it in your hands. It was a photograph something like this.
    Pages: 1
      Main » Discussion » Terminal colour schemes
      This does not actually go there and I regret nothing.