0 users browsing Discussion. | 42 bots  
    Main » Discussion » Youtube
    Pages: 1
    Posted on 20-02-04, 17:51
    Post: #337 of 426
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 499 days
    Last view: 14 days
    Looks like Youtube is killing their classic/old website design: https://imgur.com/a/5X51ux9

    AMD Ryzen 3700X | MSI Gamer Geforce 1070Ti 8GB | 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 RAM | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | Windows 10 x64
    Posted on 20-02-04, 18:48
    Has been working on the railroad

    Post: #467 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 195 days
    Last view: 4 hours
    Like I reported on Discord: I got the warning banner, I clicked it, I clicked the big button, and I got the old YT still, with the same damn banner. Top job, folks.
    Posted on 20-02-04, 18:50
    Post: #338 of 426
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 499 days
    Last view: 14 days
    I got the same, but I'm using a browser add-on that forces the old style Youtube to load so it was expected.

    AMD Ryzen 3700X | MSI Gamer Geforce 1070Ti 8GB | 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 RAM | ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero (WiFi) Motherboard | Windows 10 x64
    Posted on 20-02-04, 19:41 (revision 1)
    Mythbuster

    Post: #468 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 195 days
    Last view: 4 hours
    Snap. I forgot about those. Let me check again.

    Edit: yup, I did have one of those.
    Posted on 20-02-04, 19:46
    Dinosaur

    Post: #628 of 1315
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 58 days
    Last view: 18 hours
    Please tell me you people why do you insist in watching videos ON A WEB BROWSER, instead of a media player, as $DEITY intended...

    So, in a scale of "0 to Javascript", how terrible is it? (can't review it myself for rather obvious reasons)

    Licensed Pirate® since 2006, 100% Buttcoin™-free, enemy of All Things JavaScript™
    Posted on 20-02-04, 20:07
    Large Ham

    Post: #469 of 599
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 195 days
    Last view: 4 hours
    It's a bit hard for me to properly gauge how it is because I'm rendering a bunch of things and that slows down the rest, but the most obvious thing is that everything's so much bigger all of a sudden. Very... intended to be touch-friendly, perhaps?
    Posted on 20-02-04, 20:08
    Custom title here

    Post: #832 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 9 hours
    Posted by tomman
    Please tell me you people why do you insist in watching videos ON A WEB BROWSER, instead of a media player, as $DEITY intended...

    So, in a scale of "0 to Javascript", how terrible is it? (can't review it myself for rather obvious reasons)
    It is total Javascript.

    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 20-02-05, 04:11
    Full mod

    Post: #392 of 443
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 1101 days
    Last view: 172 days
    I was using the "use redesign N-1" addon because (at the time) the latest redesign depended on a non-standard Chrome feature, so on Firefox the site was implemented using a JS fallback.

    I don't know whether Firefox implemented the old feature, or if YouTube updated their site to use the standards-compliant version that Firefox *does* implement, but it doesn't seem to be as slow as I remembered, so yay?

    The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
    Posted on 20-02-05, 05:06

    Post: #57 of 105
    Since: 11-13-19

    Last post: 1461 days
    Last view: 1461 days
    I'm just using whatever they have always slogged off to me, with no attempt to revert to some old design. Oh, and I also use the official app on mobile devices.

    Oh, and I'm also paying them $11.99 per month for the Premium status.
    Posted on 20-02-05, 07:59
    Custom title here

    Post: #833 of 1164
    Since: 10-30-18

    Last post: 63 days
    Last view: 9 hours
    Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the problem.

    Seriously, who pays for YouTube?

    --- In UTF-16, where available. ---
    Posted on 20-02-05, 08:18 (revision 1)

    Post: #242 of 456
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 44 days
    Last view: 1 day
    Posted by tomman
    Please tell me you people why do you insist in watching videos ON A WEB BROWSER, instead of a media player, as $DEITY intended...

    A media player isn't a website that you can navigate. So you have to switch between browser and file manager, especially if you want to rename and move the file. It's not worth it if I know that I won't watch them again. The only exception for me are reactions where I watch the video in the media player and the reaction in the browser on another monitor.

    My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10
    Posted on 20-02-21, 02:35

    Post: #11 of 23
    Since: 12-13-18

    Last post: 233 days
    Last view: 208 days
    Posted by tomman
    Please tell me you people why do you insist in watching videos ON A WEB BROWSER, instead of a media player, as $DEITY intended...

    So, in a scale of "0 to Javascript", how terrible is it? (can't review it myself for rather obvious reasons)

    Everyone uploads their videos to youtube and downloading each video I want to watch to my computer sounds like a waste of time.
    Posted on 22-02-02, 07:29

    Post: #384 of 456
    Since: 10-29-18

    Last post: 44 days
    Last view: 1 day
    *bump*

    YT now prevents people from watching popular streams unless they subscribe?

    My current setup: Super Famicom ("2/1/3" SNS-CPU-1CHIP-02) → SCART → OSSC → StarTech USB3HDCAP → AmaRecTV 3.10
    Posted on 22-02-02, 08:34
    Post: #4 of 62
    Since: 01-29-22

    Last post: 865 days
    Last view: 865 days
    That might just be one of the dumbest decisions they've ever made.

    Reminds me of those "you must sign up to view anything relevant" forums kind of.
    Pages: 1
      Main » Discussion » Youtube
      Yes, it's an ad.