bboard

ne2k-pci-diag.c:v2.06 2/28/2005 Donald Becker (becker@scyld.com)
 http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html
Index #1: Found a Realtek 8029 adapter at 0x6300.
The 8390 core appears to be active, so some registers will not be read.
To see all register values use the '-f' flag.
Initial window 3, registers values by window:
  Window 0: 22 04 64 63 03 00 68 00 6a 63 50 43 01 00 00 00.
  Window 1: 62 00 06 4f 16 9b fe 64 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 40.
  Window 2: a2 00 80 ff 40 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff cc e0 c9 bf.
  Window 3: e2 30 ff 00 ff 00 70 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 29 80.
 RTL8029 transceiver: 10baseT/coax (autoselected on 10baseT link beat)  forced full duplex.
  0K boot ROM.

 No interrupt sources are pending (00).
Parsing the EEPROM of a RTL8029:
 Station Address XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX (used as the ethernet address).
 Configuration is 30 00:
   0K boot ROM, half duplex
   Transceiver: 10baseT/coax (autoselected on 10baseT link beat).
 PCI Vendor ID 0xffff  Device ID 0xffff
  Subsystem ID: vendor 0xffff device 0xffff
 Use '-a' or '-aa' to show device registers,
     '-e' to show EEPROM contents, -ee for parsed contents,
  or '-m' or '-mm' to show MII management registers.

Posted by CaptainJistuce
Hooray, the lightning didn't destroy everything!

[    9.309097] 8139cp: 8139cp: 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver v1.3 (Mar 22, 2004)
[    9.377464] 8139cp 0000:00:0a.0: This (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip, use 8139too
[    9.426866] 8139too: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.28
[    9.478556] 8139too 0000:00:0a.0 eth1: RealTek RTL8139 at 0x00016300, 00:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX, IRQ 9

# /etc/samba/smb.conf
server min protocol = NT1
client min protocol = NT1

Whoever is in charge of Corona public relations should be promptly fired for not doing a better job here.

For example, they could have included one cheap mask (with their logo with their 6-packs so "you only get the good corona"...

[16:26] tomman  well, it seems Gitlab just deployed its latest load of Chromeisms™, as it broke again on Seamonkey (even with JustOff's addon)
[16:26] tomman  SyntaxError: invalid regexp group  21.4fceb368.chunk.js:1:37724
[16:29] tomman  this regex, specifically: Re=/^&(?<iid>\d+)$/
[16:33] tomman  I'm a total moron with regexes, so can anyone please tell me what's wrong with that one?
[16:51] robobox probably another WebComponents thing
[17:50] tomman  it's a regex, tho...
[18:01] tomman  let's test what that regex actually does...
[18:01] tomman  https://regex101.com/
[18:02] tomman  it matches digits preceded by &, i.e. &12345
[18:02] tomman  and the digits are captured in a named capture group
[18:02] tomman  (the ?<iid> part, "iid" being the actual name)
[18:05] tomman  https://developer.mozilla.org/es/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Regular_Expressions#compatibilidad_del_navegador
[18:06] tomman  ...aaaand that was implemented on Firefox 78
[18:06] tomman  Bummer...
[18:06] tomman  ...at least today I learned something new (and useless... to me!)
[18:06] tomman  if we rewrite the regex as Re=/^&(\d+)$/, it works
[18:06] IanN_Away       tomman: I think frg_Away was looking at the new regular expression stuff
[18:07] tomman  so not exactly a Chromeism™ this time then 😟
[18:08] IanN_Away       tomman: not sure, frg_Away probably has all the gorey details
[18:09] frg_Away        tomman Waterfox Classic has imported it. https://github.com/WaterfoxCo/Waterfox/pull/2229
[18:09] frg_Away        Will öick it next but I am on the parser currently for the optional chaining operator. Trying to get both in but not done in a day 😊
[18:10] tomman  oooh~
[18:10] tomman  Regexes are not my friends anyway 😛
[18:11] tomman  TIL you can name your capture groups - I guess it's easier to remember match.group("foo") instead of match.group(2)
[18:11] tomman  but then you end writing more code!
[18:12] tomman  wtf, Java supports those since Java 7
[18:12] tomman  why bother with naming your capture groups for such a short regex, why why why?!
[18:13] tomman  (it's the one and only group in this example!)

Posted by daman
There's excellent Super game boy emulation on 0.70, why not to add Tristar super 8. I want to play games on super 8.