code block
Thread review | |
---|---|
Kawaoneechan |
Posted by daman I've some bad news for you. Posted by hunterk There is nothing to do about bsnes that would warrant a v116 release. It's basically finished at 115, barring weird compatibility stuff that might come up in, for example, Windows 11. |
daman | I can't wait for 116. |
tomman |
Posted by daman Because the Super 8 is a knockoff NES!!!! Get a NES emulator, end of story. |
CaptainJistuce |
Because 0.70 is a specific release, not a development branch. New development after that release would go into 0.71. But that's also in the past, so new development would go into .116. |
daman | There's excellent Super game boy emulation on 0.70, why not to add Tristar super 8. I want to play games on super 8. |
CaptainJistuce |
Posted by tomman Also, if added for some strange reason, it wouldn't be to a decade-old version of bsnes, it'd be to the current development tree. |
tomman |
Why would you even want to emulate a broken, buggy NES-on-a-chip™ "adapter" when you have far better emulators available for your personal computer? Even if we look it from a preservation aspect... there is not much to preserve here: the Tristar completely sidesteps the SNES audio/video subsystems, and it only uses the SNES hardware for input (there is a ROM, of course... which does little else than polling pad input, and that's it). So yeah, I vote for NO. |
daman | Oh. |
CaptainJistuce |
Posted by Kawaquoted for truth |
Kawaoneechan | No. |
CaptainJistuce | No. |
daman |
Hi, please make a version of 'bsnes 0.70' with a support for 'tristar super 8' to play NES games on bsnes. Or make a 'tristar super 8' update for 'bsnes 0.70'. Thanks, |